![]() Interpreting Cohort-Level Dataĭetailed program reports are designed to help programs evaluate trends in knowledge, strengths, and deficits across entire classes of students and to be used with other data points to inform program-level curricular decision-making. For these reasons, it is recommended that the PACKRAT be used as a self-assessment tool PAEA does not recommend or intend to recommend a passing grade or interpretation method for the PACKRAT. Programs can also determine their own time limit for the exam. The exam may be given proctored or unproctored and/or as an open or closed book examination. PACKRAT is designed as a self-assessment tool for students. Data are available for first-year students, second-year students, and all students who took each version. National comparative data are available for each version of PACKRAT once 300 students have taken it, and those data are updated weekly as more students take the exam. And if you are focused every day and put in your best effort, when it is time to take your PANCE, you’ll have no problem passing.PACKRAT is administered more than 18,000 times each year. While the days are long, you’ll be done before you know it. Preparing for the PANCE begins on the first day of PA school. You may benefit from reading the PANCE study plan they don’t teach you in PA school and learning about techniques to increase your PANCE score by 100 points. Give yourself plenty of time to prepare for the PANCE, both mentally and physically. The greatest impact of the new NCCPA pass rate will be on those test takers that are on the cusp. The good news is, even with an increase in the failure rate, the vast majority (9 out of 10) of students who prepare for the PANCE will pass! If 1,140 test takers fail, then, on average, almost 5 students per program are expected to fail the PANCE. With an increase in score cutoff correlating to a pass rate of 88% (with more test takers since there are more programs), then 1,140 test takers fail.Īccording to ARC-PA, there are 242 accredited PA programs. If 9,000 people took the PANCE in 2018 and the pass rate was 95%, then 450 test takers failed. So…if I barely passed the PANCE back in January, that same score today would be a failure. It appears that the passing cutoff changed. However, if I take the PANCE today and score a 350…I fail.Īccording to the announcements from the NCCPA, there is no indication that question difficulty changed. For example, if I took the PANCE in January 2019 and scored a 350 (let’s say that roughly correlated to a percentage score of 70%), I’d pass. How they are altering is still unclear, but history tells us they are increasing the passing cutoff score. The NCCPA announced they are altering the scoring of the PANCE. Throughout NCCPA’s history, although an increased passing standard typically results in a slightly reduced passing rate, over time the passing rate steadily increases. Based on the analyses conducted to estimate performance on the PANCE, it is anticipated that the pass rate for the 2019 PANCE will be slightly lower than the past few years. This trend is fairly typical of the historical standard settings. This indicates that the group of PAs who participated in the study agreed that entry-level PAs should demonstrate a slightly increased level of content knowledge in order to achieve initial certification. The recommendation from the 2018 PANCE standard setting study was approved by the NCCPA Board of Directors and resulted in a passing standard with an anticipated slightly lower passing rate when compared to the last several years. Scores typically decline for a while but gradually improve once the blueprint changes are digested and the test-taking community gets a better grasp of what new material appeared on the exam.īut wait, there’s more… NCCPA Announces Expected Decreased PANCE Pass Rates: One of the consequences of altering a blueprint is often a more challenging exam. There were significant changes in this update. Back in January 2019, the NCCPA released an updated Content Blueprint.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |